From Howard's appearance on the ABC last night:
TONY JONES: This leads us, though, anyway to the rationale for the war on Iraq, for joining it in the first place.
Does it matter if no weapons of mass destruction are found in the end?
JOHN HOWARD: I wouldn't say it doesn't matter.
I wouldn't say that at all.
It's too early to make a judgment.
People should be more patient.
TONY JONES: They should be, but people are asking questions now as to where these weapons are.
If none are found, what are the implications?
JOHN HOWARD: I think, Tony, that question should be asked, and I'd be very happy to answer it if after the elapse of a reasonable amount of time such a conclusion is reached.
But it's too early, there are too many sensitive sites, the international team of 1,300 or 1,400 is only now being assembled.
It is altogether too early for people to say, "There definitely haven't been and won't be any evidence found "that Iraq had a WMD capacity before the war started."
Those are issues that obviously I'll be asked about.
If those things happen, then I'll be --
TONY JONES: When will be the appropriate length of time?
When will we know one way or another?
JOHN HOWARD: Certainly some time from now.
I'm just a poor simple blogger but I could swear I heard John Howard tell parliament that WMDs were a matter of certainty. If we now have to wait 'some time from now' to know about WMDs why the hell did we just fight a war over them?